Tag Archives: Joshua Hedley

Album Review: Colter Wall–Songs of the Plains

Rating: 6/10

Colter Wall could be a timeless voice of this generation, and I believe he will be. When I first heard his voice, coming straight out of the past and echoing the ghost of Johnny Cash, I got chills. And his stories match his voice; he weaves tales of hopping trains and plowing fields with a natural ease, and not dated by his language but rather enhanced by it, for his turns of phrase would seem more forced if he modernized them, a direct contrast to so many of his peers who seem to choose their words carefully and intentionally to evoke days gone by. But unlike so many of these–Joshua Hedley and Zephaniah O’Hora come to mind immediately–Colter’s not trying to revive classic country. He’s not trying to bring back the outlaw era, an exercise so worn out by now that the effort to be an outlaw has become a cliché. Rather, Colter Wall goes even beyond that, seeking to keep alive the oldest forms of country and folk music, going back to the days of Wooddy Guthrie and Roger Miller for his inspiration and preserving those primitive styles and traditions in his songwriting.

Songs of the Plains seems like a natural progression for Wall, an album made in tribute to his prairie homeland in Canada and featuring some traditional tunes from his home country as well as Colter’s originals. The idea is fresh as well, keeping Colter firmly within the parameters of what he does best while also dispelling the notion created for some by his last album that he could only sing about these things for so long and in so many ways before it became stale and uninteresting. Perhaps it is the power and magic of his voice, or perhaps it’s because people have been so starved for this sound and in some cases have never been exposed to it at all, but there’s no doubt that Colter Wall’s music is resonating with many and opening windows to the past. There was the concern that he’d be a niche performer, but that niche has made him unique and seems to be what many have been longing to hear, even if they didn’t quite know it themselves. Songs of the Plains doubles down on all of it, more sparse and primitive in numerous places than Wall’s previous efforts, and it should have been a fantastic listen.

Indeed, it could have been a fantastic listen. Certainly the opener, “Plain to See Plainsman,” stands out as a brilliant ode to the prairie and starts off the record in fine fashion. Colter Wall’s love for his homeland is on full display here, and it’s one of the highlights of the whole album. “Thinkin’ on a Woman” is an excellent moment as well, a classic country heartbreak song that should have been written fifty years ago when it would have been a mainstream hit. As for the covers, “Calgary Round-Up” was a great choice, and “Night Herding Song” fits in well after it, almost like an outro. It’s hard even to distinguish these as covers given how naturally they work on this album. And then there’s “Manitoba Man,” an original which comes out of nowhere near the end of the record to remind us all that Colter Wall’s voice is not just special for its timbre but also for its ability to capture raw emotion. I think this one may be overlooked among the other songs, and that would be a shame, for it’s definitely a standout here and in Wall’s young discography.

But too often, this album is just a scattershot, frustrating listen. “Wild Dogs” is the worst misstep, and although not Colter’s original work, it was a terrible choice for a cover and just makes for a very weird, unnecessary moment. The song itself is just awful and strange, but it’s not fair to dwell on the writing as much as the choice by Wall to cover it here. AS for Colter’s own writing, the lyrics are mostly strong, although some songs feel underdeveloped. “The Trains are Gone” is just boring and forgettable, and “John Beyers (Camaro Song”) just feels too short, as if Colter stopped writing in the middle of the story. Also, you can find the same melodic line in “saskatchewan in 1881” that was present in “Bald Butte” on his debut record. I enjoy both these songs, and this might be more easily excused if the same melodic line didn’t come up again in “The Trains are Gone.” It just seems like such a lazy songwriting decision and one which Colter Wall is better than making.

There are some lazy production decisions as well. On the surface, the production seems perhaps more interesting than that of his first full album, with harmonica and steel adding color to some of these tracks. Many criticized the production of Wall’s self-titled record as being too plain, too sparse, and even boring. Personally, I felt Dave Cobb did well by getting out of the way and letting the songs speak for themselves, and I enjoy the fact that Colter often needs nothing more than his voice and a guitar to bring those songs to life. But when you’re relying so heavily on a voice and guitar, the guitar work needs to be better. There is noticeable, constant buzzing of the strings in several of these songs, most obviously in “John Beyers (Camaro Song.”) This song, as mentioned, also seems too short, and the whole thing just comes across as unfinished and rushed. The buzzing guitar strings return in “Wild dogs” and in “Thinkin’ on a Woman” and really, in places all over this record. This is something you hear inevitably with acoustic guitars, and hearing it on occasion can even add to the live feel of a song, as the imperfection brings the human touch to the recording. But it is so constant in some of these songs that it becomes distracting, and the obvious question is why did Colter wall accept these recordings as the final versions he wanted to send out to the public? Once again, he is just better than this.

This record is ultimately just not up to the standards Colter Wall has set for himself. The idea behind it was fantastic, and there are some excellent songs on this album. “Plain to See Plainsman,” “Manitoba Man,” and “Thinkin’ on a Woman” particularly stand out as being timeless additions to Wall’s discography. But the album as a whole just feels rushed and underdeveloped. It’s a collection of little things, but all those small decisions add up to a finished product that seems unfinished. Clean this record up a bit, and it improves significantly. Just a little more care was needed to make this album what it could have been. The potential and talent in Colter Wall remain endless, but unfortunately this album as a whole falls short of that potential.

Buy the Album

The Great

The Weird

April Playlist on Spotify and Apple Music

April has by far been the busiest month in terms of releases that this site has seen since it began–well, March 30th really began it all with one of the best release days in this site’s history, and then nothing has slowed down since. It’s no surprise that April was also by far our most viewed month ever, and if you’ve first found us in April, I thank you. If you couldn’t keep up with releases, I don’t blame you, and this list is for you. Whereas past months have seen me wondering if we’d have enough good music to fill the playlist, this was the first time I’ve actually cut songs from one because so much good music came out. We’ve got Southern rock from Blackberry Smoke, classic country from Joshua Hedley, Willie Nelson and John Prine proving age is irrelevant when making good music, and some solid mainstream cuts from Jason Aldean and Brothers Osborne. Three of my favorite songs of the year so far are on this list in “Look Away” from Old Crow Medicine Show, “Orphan” from Ashley Monroe, and “New Ways to Fail” from Sarah Shook & the Disarmers. What a great time to be alive and be a music fan! As always, and probably more so currently, thank you to Zack for supplying this to the Spotify people.

Apple Music users, you can follow me there via the user name @countryexclusive for this and all our playlists, as well as updates to Saving Country Music’s top 25. For April’s,
Click here

Spotify users, click below.

Collaborative Review: Joshua Hedley – Mr. Jukebox

Joshua Hedly’s debut album Mr. Jukebox is one that was an interesting listen for us both. It’s very cool that it’s so traditional, but it leads to a lot of the same authenticity debates that have been plaguing country, and whether something has to be completely traditional-sounding to be considered “real country.” It brought up some interesting discussion points, particularly as we both liked the album less with more listens.

Conversation

Megan: So let’s talk about the parts of this album we did enjoy, because it was kind of a strange experience for us both over the course of listening to it. I know a big draw obviously for you would be the sound.

Brianna: Oh yes, the sound played a big part in my feelings toward this album. Right away, it was easy to see that this would be very traditional. I loved the piano, fiddle, and steel guitar used throughout. It all really goes back to the 50s and 60s, and the sounds that were popular then.

Megan: It goes back to that in such a way that I can’t help but be impressed by it. Even down to his inflections and phrasing, it sounds classic. I wasn’t a huge fan of his voice like I know you were, but he definitely is convincing at the style.

Brianna: I agree about it being really convincing, as far as the musical tone. As for his voice, you’re right. I was really impressed at his talent. He’s just a singer who I really appreciate, and for me, when I can find someone who is working within the field of traditional country, and also has singing talent, I’m a happy camper.

Megan: I mean, I wasn’t moved either way by his voice. Not especially great or especially bad, at least for me. For me, it was the songwriting I initially liked. I shouldn’t say initially, I still do like a lot of these songs on paper. The first time I listened to this, it didn’t blow me away, but I thought it was solid. Was it like that for you? You probably actually liked it better than me at first.

Brianna: Oh yeah, at first, I was ready to be blown away. Hearing him sing on “Counting All My Tears”, I just knew it was going to be great. So, when I was first listening to this, I sort of liked it more. But the more I listened to the album, the weaker it became. Yes, I still like it, but now? Not as much. I’d say for me, about four of these songs really stand out completely.

Megan: Which songs? And what made it weaker? I know it got weaker for both of us, but I think we’ve got somewhat different reasons for that.

Brianna: I love “Counting All My Tears” for its slower tempo, as well as the way his voice just fits with the song. It’s really the only one of the slower songs I believe in. I could really be convinced that he’s really sad about his past relationship not working out. “These Walls” is one I like, just because he’s saying that the walls could tell a story about a relationship gone wrong. I love the upbeat “Let Them Talk”, just because the narrator doesn’t care about what others say, he’s happy with the woman he’s found. My favorite is the title track, though. “Mr. Jukebox” is awesome, as it’s from the perspective of the jukebox, telling stories about all the people around it.
What made it weaker was the fact that I honestly started finding the other songs sleepy or uninteresting. A lot of them are slower, but just because a song is slow doesn’t mean it has to be sleepy. Plus, a lot of these songs are about pain or trying to fix a relationship, and bored is the last thing I should feel. What about you? What are your standouts, and what brought this album down for you?

Megan: Slow songs don’t have to be sleepy is a great point. Jason Eady is the poster child of this quote. Anyway, I agree wholeheartedly that “Mr. Jukebox” is the best. It was the lead-off song and had me really excited for this. He’s best doing this sort of upbeat, shuffling traditional thing. Also agree on “Let Them Talk.” As for the slower songs, I enjoy the lyrics of “Weird Thought Thinker” quite a bit. I think I’d like this more in another singer’s hands. “Counting All My Tears” I’d agree on as well, I think he does sound more convincing in that one.
Which leads me to my biggest issue. It’s so caught up in trying to be traditional that it just feels like he’s doing a style. As we’ve pointed out, he’s doing it flawlessly, but I really don’t feel like I know much about Joshua Hedley after this other than that he really likes and respects traditional country. There’s nothing wrong with recreating this style, that’s what Zephaniah Ohora did last year on an album we both love. You loved Zephaniah long before me, so you’re probably a better authority on this, but I believe him when he sings. Not every word and phrase and chorus is throwback just for the sake of it.

Brianna: Oh yes. I believe what Zephaniah sings. I don’t, however, believe everything Joshua sings. I’m just not convinced he felt the emotion in the songs, and if the artist is lukewarm on a subject, it will likely rub off on the listener. Or, at least, to my way of thinking. For all I know, he isn’t lukewarm on the topics; it’s just how it comes across to me. Like he’s just going through the motions.

Megan: Do you think it’s a problem with how traditional and not contemporary he’s trying to be, or just more of a problem of him not really finding his sound as an artist? I guess what I mean is, do you think if he develops his songwriting and gives us more originality, he can release a 2nd album with this throwback sound and have it work in this day and age?

Brianna Well, if he released an album with more originality, but with the same kind of sound? I’d be all over it. Lol. Honestly, though, I think it might be both that he felt like he had to use the style he did, and that he is still trying to find his sound. I think he has a lot of potential, and I am interested to see what he comes up with next, I just hope that he doesn’t limit himself as he did on Mr. Jukebox.

Megan: Honestly, I don’t know. I thought at first it was just because of how identical he was trying to be to this style, but Colter Wall sings lines like “drew myself up” and “I made for the creek,” and for me, his music comes off timeless rather than dated. Same with Zephaniah Ohora, although his songwriting is more modern. This feels dated somehow. I wanted to like this more than I do, and I agree that he’s got a ton of potential. The opportunities he’s already had by releasing an album like this in 2018 on Third Man Records are encouraging. I guess I like him and the idea of it all more than the album, lol.

Brianna: I’m not a Colter fan, but I do like that sort of older language. It makes things feel more authentic. That’s always great.
But I agree, I like the idea of this more than the actual album, and that’s disappointing, as a traditional country fan.

Megan: It’s also disappointing because there’s not really one moment I don’t like here, except the awkward cover of “When You Wish Upon a Star.” But other than that, there’s nothing really awful about any of it individually, it’s just an overarching problem.
Overall, I am impressed by the sound and the production and the songwriting. I think Hedley has a lot of potential, and I’m glad to see an album like this get made in 2018. It’s still a positive thing as a whole and has some standout songs, but it lacks identity. I want to hear more Joshua Hedley next time to build on this very cool foundation. Solid 6 from me, I think.

Brianna: That’s a great point that should be made, that nothing is awful about this album. Like you, my only real awkward moment is “When You Wish Upon A Star”, but that’s both because it’s a cover, and also due to the jazz atmosphere of it. Like you, I’d love to hear more of himself on his next album, but I’m also encouraged at seeing something so blatantly traditional be pushed so much this year. I’d like to go with a 7, but I believe a more accurate rating for this would be 6.5, simply due to the fact that I don’t love over half of the album. Still, this is something I recommend any traditional country fan should check out. It’s very possible you all may have different opinions than Megan and myself.

Ratings

Brianna: 6.5/10
Megan: 6/10

Buy the Album On Amazon